A Denmark-based citizen has been convicted of uploading nude scenes from copyrighted films and TV series on the social media site Reddit.
Based on a police document obtained by BBC News, the anonymous man posted 347 video excerpts of nude scenes in a subreddit he moderated, which were then watched 4.2 million-plus times.
The country's authorities confirm he has been given a seven-month deferred jail term for violating copyright laws.
Legal analysts explain the defendant was prosecuted under a seldom-invoked provision in Danish copyright law, with the court ruling that by taking the footage out of their intended setting, the man had damaged the artists' "moral rights".
He has also been found guilty of distributing more than 25 TB of copyrighted digital content.
From March 2022 to May 2023, the man using the alias "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded sexually explicit scenes featuring over 100 female performers.
He shared them in the forum he was a moderator of.
According to the Danish copyright protection organization The Rights Alliance (TRA), his online community had more than 6,000 members and participants were encouraged to request excerpts of specific performers.
In last year, campaigners filed the case to the authorities on behalf of the affected actors, directors and producers, which resulted in the forum being shut down.
One actress, one of the performers whose explicit scenes were circulated in the community, explained to local media at the time she believed there was a distinction between being seen naked in a film and appearing on Reddit.
The actress said the posts amounted to "abuse".
The defendant was arrested in September 2024 and pleaded guilty to the charges recently.
In a statement after the ruling, the head of the Rights Alliance the organization's leader remarked the outcome sent an "significant" signal "indicating violations of creators' rights have repercussions".
The ruling is considered unique in Denmark for its use of the "ethical protections" clause of the Danish Copyright Act, which states an creator's creation cannot be utilized in a manner which violates their standing.
Copyright law expert a legal scholar told the media the legal matter was "unusual" for its focus on the damage to the integrity of an artist, rather than to them economically.
How the ruling could influence other countries is unclear.
But she said there may be "an increasing number of these actions" in the coming years with the advancement of AI, where "the sanctity of one's creative output might be tempered with with greater ease".